|
Book - Customer Review:2
Knightfall: Knight Ridder And How The Erosion Of Newspaper Journalism Is Putting Democracy At Risk
Davis Merritt
Rating: 4.5/5 Stars
Rank: 1037
An Insider's View of What We Have All Suspected (Athens, GA USA) March 29, 2005 - 4.0/5 stars
On first glance, I was not sure if a review of Knightfall: Knight Ridder
and How The Erosion of Newspaper Journalism Is Putting Democracy At Risk,
by Davis Merritt (242 pages, American Management Association, 2005) would
fit in the context of what I normally write.
But as I read the book on
Saturday evening, I found that although there was not necessarily a direct
correlation on its face, the whole underlying theme of segregation of
duties/responsibility resonated with me. Why? Because like in the business
environment, the break down of barriers in corporate owned newspapers is
significantly eroding journalistic integrity, and according to Merritt,
puts the notion of Democracy at risk.
Right up front, Merritt
admits his bias.
As a former editor with Knight Ridder Newspapers, he was
present at the beginning of this conglomerate. The merger between Knight,
which focused on journalistic integrity, and Ridder, which focused on the
bottom line, provides the backdrop for the perfect case study of what
happens when two corporations with totally opposite core values and
culture come together, and in this case how the bottom line becomes the
driver when key mistakes are made in structuring the corporation.
The book does not flow as easily as others I have recently read
and at times Merritt unnecessarily repeats himself. but he does manage to
weave a story that starts back in the 19th Century when the two companies
were originally formed.
He examines what was fundamentally different in
the two families, one small, and one large with many sons who needed
businesses.
The story then evolves into one of corporate positioning and
internal culture wars as the two organizations tried to meld.
Much like
the merger of Lotus Development Corporation and IBM, the culture wars left
many casualties and bad feelings as the integration slowly moved through
the years.
It was during this time frame that Merritt went
from being a journalist and editor focused on journalistic integrity to
becoming a bean counter with orders to constantly cut costs.
He uses a
simple metric to show this decay: the number of Pulitzer Prizes won. What
has happened over the past decade is that corporate owned newspapers with
only one class of stock, and therefore beholden to Wall Street analysts
and short term profit motives, have experienced a sharp decline in the
number of Pulitzer Prizes as compared to newspapers such as the New York
Times and the Washington Post.
Another disturbing trend
Merritt notes is the decline of ethics in journalism, citing not front
page stories like Jayson Blair, but other cases he has personally been
involved in with his own subordinates.
In the examples he gives, stronger
business controls would have detected and prevented the transgressions.
But this is the rub. Like academia, journalists bristle at any kind of
controls as being a violation of their first amendment rights.
It also
leads to very public embarrassments.
So how does this all
put democracy at risk? It happens, according to Merritt, by putting the
bottom line above doing responsible, in-depth journalism which o other
medium as the time of resources to do well.
Blogs, he acknowledges have a
place, but still are without traditional journalistic review standards for
accuracy.
Given limited budgets, newspapers no longer are able to cover
issues of importance to the public and uncover important stories such as
Watergate.
The question is whether this is journalistic arrogance (and
Merritt admits he has been called as such in his fight with the corporate
world) or a very real truth worth reflecting on.
If you are
interested in reading an insider's view of this decay, this book may be
worth a read. If you don't have the time to read it, just look at the
newspapers produced by Knight-Ridder and decide if it is puff journalism
or the real thing.
And then ask yourselves if this is what you want from
your newspapers, especially when even the worst ones make incredibly large
profit margins.
Scorecard: Par on an Average Par 4
Customer Review: 2 of 2
Customer Reviews
Knightfall: Knight Ridder And How The Erosion Of Newspaper Journalism Is Putting Democracy At Risk
Davis Merritt
Customer Review
1 - 2 of 2
![]() | | 1. | The state of America's newspapers | | (Spokane, WA) March 24, 2005 - 5.0/5 stars | | In the interest of full disclosure, I need to explain that I worked for
the author, Buzz Merritt, for 13 years at the Wichita Eagle. I have
immense personal and professional respect for Buzz and I am grateful for
all... read full review |
![]() | | Current Review | | 2. | An Insider's View of What We Have All Suspected | | (Athens, GA USA) March 29, 2005 - 4.0/5 stars | | On first glance, I was not sure if a review of Knightfall: Knight Ridder
and How The Erosion of Newspaper Journalism Is Putting Democracy At Risk,
by Davis Merritt (242 pages, American Management Association, 2005) would... read full review |
Editorials
Sample 2 of 2
Knightfall: Knight Ridder And How The Erosion Of Newspaper Journalism Is Putting Democracy At Risk
Davis Merritt
![]() | | | From Booklist | | With more than 40 years of experience with the Knight and Knight Ridder
newspaper empire, Merritt is well positioned to analyze how that venerable
news organization and American journalism in general are struggling... read full editorial |
![]() | | | From the Inside Flap | | The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is clear: Congress shall make
no law abridging freedom of the press. And yet a force seemingly even more
powerful than the supreme law of the land threatens one... read full editorial |
Top 10 Best Selling Business Book Categories
|
|